Coaching software stack calculator
This calculator adds up what your coaching software stack really costs and how fragmented it is. Enter each tool you pay for, its monthly price and the workflow categories it covers. It totals your monthly and annual spend, optionally estimates the admin time lost moving between tools, counts how many workflow categories are duplicated across tools, and produces a transparent 0-100 fragmentation score. Everything is calculated in your browser from your own numbers.
Everything is calculated in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere or stored.
How the calculation works
Every number is a direct function of what you enter. There are no benchmarks and no assumed savings.
Monthly software cost is the sum of each tool's monthly price. Annual software cost is that figure times twelve. If you fill in the optional time inputs, monthly admin hours are your weekly admin minutes times 52, divided by 12, divided by 60; monthly admin cost is those hours times your own hourly value. Estimated total monthly stack cost is software plus admin; the annual total is that times twelve. Duplicated categories are the workflow categories used by two or more of your tools.
| Output | Formula |
|---|---|
| Monthly software cost | sum(monthly cost of each tool) |
| Annual software cost | monthly software cost x 12 |
| Monthly admin hours | weekly admin minutes x 52 / 12 / 60 |
| Monthly admin cost | monthly admin hours x your hourly value |
| Total monthly stack cost | monthly software cost + monthly admin cost |
| Annual total | total monthly stack cost x 12 |
| Duplicated categories | count of categories used by 2+ tools |
How the fragmentation score works
Software fragmentation is not the number of tools in a stack. It is the amount of duplicated data, duplicated functionality and manual handoff between them. The score reflects that: it weights duplication and manual handoff heavily and the raw number of tools lightly, so a lean stack of good specialist tools is not punished for existing.
Four components are each normalized to a 0-1 value, then weighted and summed to a 0-100 score. A third party can reproduce it by hand.
| Component | Weight | What it measures | Reaches its maximum at |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duplication | 40 | Share of your covered categories that live in 2+ tools | every covered category duplicated |
| Manual handoff | 35 | Weekly minutes copying, searching and following up | 300 minutes/week (5 hours) |
| Tool spread | 15 | Separate tools beyond a baseline of three | 8 or more tools |
| Client split | 10 | Client-facing tools beyond one (multiple logins) | 4 or more client-facing tools |
What the score means
Bands: 0-24 low fragmentation, 25-49 moderate, 50-74 high, 75-100 very high. The result page also names the one or two components driving your score, for example duplicated scheduling and client data plus two and a half hours of weekly handoff, rather than a vague verdict.
The score is a prompt for a decision, not a grade. It says nothing about the quality of your coaching or the quality of any individual tool.
What fragmentation actually costs
Direct subscription spend is the visible cost, but it is often the smaller one. Fragmentation becomes expensive when the same client data lives in several places, when you copy context between systems before every session, when clients manage multiple logins, and when accountability and session context sit in different tools that do not talk to each other.
That is why the calculator lets you add the admin time you actually spend moving information around. It does not assume a number for you; if you leave it blank, it stays zero.
When multiple tools are still the right choice
More tools is not automatically worse. A specialist stack can be entirely rational when each tool has a genuine strength, integrations keep data in sync, information is not duplicated, the client experience stays coherent, and manual handoffs are minimal.
Fragmentation becomes costly in the opposite case: the same data re-entered in multiple places, the coach repeatedly copying context, clients juggling several portals, and workflows that depend on manual steps between systems. The distinction matters, so the score measures fragmentation rather than counting vendors.
What one coaching workspace can consolidate
If your fragmentation comes from managing the coaching relationship across separate tools, one coaching-shaped workspace can combine several of those workflows. Exantur covers client management, scheduling, session notes, goals and progress, accountability, check-ins, forms and assessments, documents, invoicing and payments, a client portal, messaging, courses and materials, reporting, contracts with e-signature, and workflow automation, organized around the coaching relationship.
It will not replace every tool, and it should not. Keep any specialist software that does something a coaching workspace does not. The calculator shows your own numbers first; the consolidation note only appears after them, as a neutral overlap check.
Methodology, assumptions and limitations
This is a version 1 tool. It uses only the numbers you enter and the deterministic formulas above. It contains no industry averages, no percentiles, no "most coaches" claims and no guaranteed savings. The fragmentation score does not predict coaching outcomes and is not a compliance or security assessment.
The score weights and normalization caps are fixed and documented, so the same inputs always produce the same result. If a future version adds anonymous, opt-in aggregate data, any benchmark would be labelled as such and kept separate from your own calculation.
Frequently asked questions
- Is my data sent anywhere?
- No. The calculator runs entirely in your browser. Tool names, prices and time inputs are not sent to a server or stored, and no account is required.
- Does a higher score mean I should drop tools?
- Not necessarily. The score measures fragmentation, duplicated data, duplicated functionality and manual handoff, not the number of vendors. A lean specialist stack with good integrations can score low even with several tools.
- Where do the admin numbers come from?
- From you. If you fill in the optional weekly minutes and your hourly value, the tool converts them to a monthly cost with a transparent formula. Left blank, admin cost is zero. No average is assumed.
- How is the fragmentation score calculated?
- Four normalized components, duplication (weight 40), manual handoff (35), tool spread (15) and client split (10), are summed to a 0-100 score. The full formula and caps are shown on this page and are reproducible by hand.
- Does it show how much I would save with Exantur?
- No. Version 1 deliberately avoids an asserted saving. It shows your own numbers, then a neutral note on which of your selected categories one coaching workspace could consolidate.
Related
One workspace instead of a stack of subscriptions
See which of your coaching workflows Exantur can bring into one place.
